Mr.K told me his anger in his email. He is a senior technical director of a factory. Recently he received a warning from the factory manager for his taken annual leaves but not reported.
After a few rounds of discussion, the factory manager refused to withdraw the warming. As a consequence, Mr. K had no choice but to take up lawsuit to defend himself.
“Will I win this lawsuit? What else actions I shall take?
See from the model. Mr.K is the complaint has a good chance to win this lawsuit, because the judge is on his side. On the party who is responsible for the case, his/her attitude is ambiguous. The lawyer is sophisticate minded, he has some concerns so you need to pay extra attention.
The symbol of the company falls in segment #4 which carries a unseasonal sign. The symbol of the arbitrary body falls in a segment that in favour of Mr.K’s segment. The model also shows the evidence is empty. So the first thing for Mr.K is do is to well prepare and collect evidence that can help him win this case.
Strategy wise, combination of the model suggests Mr.K shall not approach the factory manager again but to play a low key. The defendant will sooner or later proactively come to him.
As customer feedback, the company top management hired a third party agent help to resolve this matter. Mr.K’s warning was cancel and he received some compensation.
After a few rounds of discussion, the factory manager refused to withdraw the warming. As a consequence, Mr. K had no choice but to take up lawsuit to defend himself.
“Will I win this lawsuit? What else actions I shall take?
See from the model. Mr.K is the complaint has a good chance to win this lawsuit, because the judge is on his side. On the party who is responsible for the case, his/her attitude is ambiguous. The lawyer is sophisticate minded, he has some concerns so you need to pay extra attention.
The symbol of the company falls in segment #4 which carries a unseasonal sign. The symbol of the arbitrary body falls in a segment that in favour of Mr.K’s segment. The model also shows the evidence is empty. So the first thing for Mr.K is do is to well prepare and collect evidence that can help him win this case.
Strategy wise, combination of the model suggests Mr.K shall not approach the factory manager again but to play a low key. The defendant will sooner or later proactively come to him.
As customer feedback, the company top management hired a third party agent help to resolve this matter. Mr.K’s warning was cancel and he received some compensation.